PENGARUH STRATEGI PREVIEW, QUESTION, READ, REFLECT, RECITE, AND REVIEW (PQ4R) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA

Asrean Hendi

Abstract


One of the causes of the lack of mathematical problem-solving skills because teachers have not directed and trained students in the learning process, so that students in the learning process has not been able to solve math problems well. One of the strategies to help students understand and remember the material they read is Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, and Review (PQ4R) learning strategies, because in learning mathematics requires the ability to read and understand the material or lessons well so that students can solve Math problems. This research type is Quasi Experimental research, population in this research is all student of class XI IPA SMA Negeri 15 Bandar Lampung which consist of 4 class. The sampling technique used a random class where class XI IPA 1 as experimental class with learning strategy PQ4R and class XI IPA 2 as control class with expository learning. Data analysis techniques in this study using the normality test, homogeneity test and T test. Based on the results of t-test calculation obtained t count = 6,134 and ttable = 2,004. Based on these calculations it can be seen that thitung> ttabel. Thus, it can be concluded that H0 is rejected, so it means there is an influence of PQ4R strategy to improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities.

Keywords


ability; Solving; problem; Mathematics, PQ4R

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agus Suprijono.(2015). Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Anas Sudijono, (2013), Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Asep Jihad, Abdul Haris. (2008). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Baharuddin dan Esa Nur Wahyuni.(2010). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar- Ruzz Media. 2010

Bell, F.H. (1978). Teaching and Learning Mathematics (in Secondary Schools. Second

Printing. Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown. Company.

Branca, N.A. (1980). Problem Solving as a Goal, Process and Basic Skill. Dalam Krulik,S

dan Reys,R.E (ed). Problem Solving in School Mathematics. NCTM: Reston

Virginia.

Depdiknas. 2003. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka

Dick, W & Carey, L. 2005. The Systematic Design of Instruction.Boston : Pearson.

Gagné,R.M, Briggs, L.J dan Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4nd

ed). Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winstone, Inc.

Hamzah Uno. (2007) .Model pembelajaran menciptakan proses belajar mengajar yang kreatif dan efektif.Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harun Rasyid, Mansur, (2007). Penelitian Hasil Belajar Bandung: CV. Wacana Prima.

Kreshna Wardani, Retnanda. (2016). Upaya Peningkatan Aktivitas Belajar Dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Kooperatif Tipe Kancing Gemerincing Dengan Strategi Pembelajaran

PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review) Pada Siswa Kelas

VIII (Penelitian Dilakukan Di Smp Negeri 11 Surakarta Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015). Other Thesis. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Khamidah, K. ; S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Di Tinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey, 7(2), 145–162. Retrieved from http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/al-jabar/article/view/38

Lester, F. K., & Kehle, P. E. (2003). From Problem Solving to Modeling: The Evolution of Thinking About Research on Complex Mathematical Activit. In R. Lesh, & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond Constructivism – Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematical Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching (pp. 501-517). Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Made Wena. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontenmporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Muhibbin Syah.(2012). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Mulyati. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemahaman Dan Represebtasi Matematis Siswa SMA Melalui Strategi Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, And

Review (PQ4R) (Kuasi Eksperimen Pada Siswa Sma Di Kabupaten Indramayu).

Jurnal Analisa Volume I Nomor 3. ISSN :2549 – 5143 (Online) : 2549 –

(Print)

NCTM. (1980). Problem Solving in School Mathematics. Yearbook: NCTM Inc.

Puspitasari, R.P. (2003). Strategi-Strategi Belajar. Materi Pelatihan Terintegrasi Berbasis Kompetensi Guru Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jakarta : Direktorat Pendidikan

Lanjutan Pertama. DitjenDikdasmen. Depdiknas.

Polya, G. (1985). How to Solve It . A New Aspect of Mathematical Method (2nd ed).

Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press.

Sahat Saragih, (2014). The Improving of Problem Solving Ability and Students’ Creativity Mathematical by Using Problem Based Learning in SMP Negeri 2 Siantar. Journal

Of Education and Practice . ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)

Vol.5, No.35, 2014.

Sugiman. (2015). Peran Guru Matematika Dalam Mewujudkan Siswa Yang Konstruktif Melalui Pemecahan Masalah. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika. UNY: ISBN. 978-602-73403- 0-5.

Suharsimi Arikunto, (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi

Aksara.

Soedjadi, R.( 2004). CBC PMRI and Education in an Era of Autonomy. Bulletin PMRI

Third Edition. London: ITB KPPMT.

S. Nasution. (2008). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta:

Bumi Aksara.

Siswono, Tatag, Ahmad Wachidul Kohar, Ika Kurniasari, dan Yuliani Puji Astuti. (2015). An Investigation of Secondary Teachers’ Understanding and Belief on Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal of Physics, 693, (2016) 012015.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Trianto,(2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta:

Prestasi Pustaka.

Trianto. (2010). Mendesain model pembelajaran inivatif-progresif. Jakarta: kencana.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.